Tymur Bieldiugin vs Francois Musitelli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Recent Performance in Second Serve: In the past six months, Musitelli has exhibited an impressive capability in winning 51.51% of points played on their second serve. On the other hand, Bieldiugin has shown a slightly lower proficiency, winning 44.6% of such points. It is fascinating to note that there exists a substantial correlation between this statistical metric and the accurate prediction of match outcomes.

Insights from Return Game Statistics: A scrutiny of return game statistics reveals that Musitelli, in their recent form, has triumphed in an exceptional 53.66% of their opponent's second serve points. Comparatively, Bieldiugin has secured victory in 52.63% of such points. Additionally, when it comes to first serve returns, Musitelli has recorded a success rate of 31.7%, whereas Bieldiugin has managed to attain 34.72%. These figures possess a significant correlation in identifying the favorite in this head-to-head (H2H) encounter.

Analysis under Pressure: In situations where pressure is at its highest, Musitelli has exhibited remarkable composure by saving an impressive 66.05% of breakpoints in their recent matches. Conversely, Bieldiugin has proven to be adept at handling pressure, saving 55.56% of breakpoints. This statistic holds immense value when it comes to predicting in-game betting outcomes.

Performance Overview: Over the past year, Musitelli has emerged victorious in an impressive 69.05% of matches played, boasting a win-to-loss ratio of 29/13. On the other hand, Bieldiugin has showcased a respectable win rate of 53.85%, with a win-to-loss ratio of 21/18. These figures provide us with an overall prediction overview of their head-to-head encounters.

Optimal Playing Surfaces: Musitelli has found their greatest success on the hard courts, commanding an impressive win percentage of 68% (W/L 46/22). In contrast, their performance on grass courts has been less stellar, securing no victories in their sole match played. Bieldiugin, on the other hand, has displayed exceptional proficiency on indoor hard courts, triumphing in 100% of their matches (W/L 1/0). Nonetheless, their performance on hard courts has been slightly less impressive, with a win rate of 50% (W/L 2/2).

Player Classification: Over the past year, Musitelli has predominantly competed in lower-tier tournaments such as the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10K. In these events, they have emerged victorious in 69.05% of matches played (W/L 29/13). Similarly, Bieldiugin has predominantly participated in the same category of tournaments, achieving a win rate of 53.85% (W/L 21/18). When evaluating the statistics between players to predict the favored contender, it is crucial to consider the level of competition they have been exposed to.

Opponent Quality Statistics: Throughout the past 12 months, Musitelli has faced opponents with an average rank of 210.67. In contrast, Bieldiugin has encountered players with an average rank of 163.36. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered and can contribute to predicting their performances.

Deciding Set Performance: For enthusiasts of live predictions and betting, if this match proceeds into a deciding set, Musitelli has demonstrated a remarkable track record by winning 75% of deciding sets within the past 12 months. On the other hand, Bieldiugin has proven themselves capable by securing victories in 67% of all matches played on the tour.

Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Evaluating the historical performance of players is undoubtedly crucial in the prediction of tennis matches. However, once an event commences, it becomes pertinent to consider the current event statistics to gauge the form of the players involved. Thus, it is advisable to refer to the section below, which provides an overview of their performance in the ongoing event. Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that certain players thrive under specific event conditions, a factor worth deliberating to determine the eventual outcome.

Break Point Conversion: Noteworthy is Musitelli's recent form, wherein they have capitalized on 43.28% of their breakpoint opportunities. Meanwhile, Bieldiugin has exhibited a similar effectiveness by converting 44.68% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These figures prove to be insightful in providing in-game live betting tips when one of the players encounters a breakpoint opportunity.

If you are intrigued by models that forecast tennis matches, an excellent point of departure would be this article (Warning: For enthusiasts of statistical analysis only).